Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Images that sing. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. Heh, it's amazing how far Samyang has come since this article (I'm loving their 45 & 75 f1.8), and kinda amusing that they ended up delivering exactly what you asked for Kinda reminds me of that article by Roger Cicala about how long lens development takes. Well, for me. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. This thing is a beast in comparison. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. Focus throw. It's a trade off. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. ", I'd no problem with that. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. The rest are relatively uncreative, and just seem lame to me. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. The lens shows a very slight pincushion distortion, but it's well under 0.1% of frame height, an excellent performance by any measure. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments. In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. In general, prime telephotos should outperform zooms. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 Not rude at all, a fair comment. I bought it for its bokeh. A lot of us have been saying this for years. The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. The Andromeda Galaxy using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Yes, she's isolated. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. However, as I have no actual experience with the Baader filter, I would suggest that you consult other members on the particular APO - Baader filter combination you have in mind. I typically shoot with Canon lenses, but the potential for low light photography (whether thats astrophotography or the ability to film at dusk) caught my interest. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. There are times that making no comment at all is far more telling than posting negative - and sometimes offensive - ad hominem attacks on the author for daring to show some enthusiasm. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. Sharp without being harsh. To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Robert. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. That means that it doesnt require a robust equatorial telescope mount as a larger, heavier telephoto lens would. Stuff I used to take the photos. MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! Have you ever come across this phenomena? 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. Let's dig in. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? Thus the enthusiasm has a valid basis but may not be suitable for all shooting conditions. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography.